Med Review Blg Img

Blog: The Impact of GG Accuracy to Medical Review

Lack of substantiation of MDS Section GG is frequently a citation among medical review findings, especially from Managed Care audit contractors. In absence of GG supporting documentation, reviewers will determine a resident’s function score to be consistent with independent performance. Tips for improving GG documentation follow.

  • Designate a process for recording resident performance, considering:
    • Timeliness for data collection
      • Should occur within the initial 3 days of the stay, or the ARD and 2 days prior
      • Should happen prior to benefit of treatment intervention
    • Source documentation for data collection
      • Should be collaborative in nature through interview of resident, family and staff
      • Should assure all items have been addressed and are reflected in documentation
      • Should be recorded by IDT members with a demonstrated understanding of definitions and coding of each task
  • Identify a means for assessing usual performance, considering:
    • Documentation (e.g., signed/dated summary by IDT members whose scope of practice includes assessment capacity)
    • Timeliness (e.g., by conclusion of Day 3)
  • Ensure accuracy of values captured in Section GG
    • Review scores recorded in MDS Section GG against the signed/dated assessment
    • Confirm all values are supported by source documentation
    • Verify source documentation and assessment are contained within the Electronic Medical Record for ease of location in event of an audit

As review of GG items is often a quick win for medical review contractors, taking time to solidify processes and documentation tools will contribute to audit success.

Share the Word

Join Our Mailing List!

Bee Pillar

Hive-Mentality

Person Pillar

Patient-Centered

Quality Pillar

Quality Solutions